Home » 264 / 6.5 mm » 6.5 Creedmoor » Fiocchi Extrema 6.5 Creedmoor 130 gr Swift Scirocco II

Fiocchi Extrema 6.5 Creedmoor 130 gr Swift Scirocco II

0

Ammo Reports Team 2 6.5 Creedmoor

SaveSavedRemoved 0

Official Specs

Ballistics Table

Calculated. Zero: 100 yards. Sight height: 1.5″ above bore. BC (G1): 0.571 (Swift Scirocco II 130 gr, published).

Key takeaway: the Swift Scirocco II’s BC of 0.571 produces a trajectory competitive with premium 140 gr loads while the 130 gr weight delivers higher muzzle velocity. At 300 yards only 19.1 inches of drop and 1,680 ft-lbs of retained energy — well above the threshold for ethical elk hunting. The bonded construction is the defining advantage over non-bonded competitors at the same price point.

The Swift Scirocco II Bullet

The Swift Scirocco II is a premium bonded hunting bullet from Swift Bullets — a smaller, specialized manufacturer less prominent than Hornady or Nosler but with a strong reputation among serious big game hunters. Key construction features:

• Bonded core — the lead core is chemically bonded to the tapered copper jacket, preventing core-jacket separation on impact; this is the critical difference vs non-bonded bullets like SST or InterLock
• Polymer tip (polymer tip spitzer) — initiates reliable expansion across impact velocity ranges from close-range to long-range shots
• Secant ogive — a more aggressive nose profile than tangent ogive designs, contributing to the higher BC of 0.571 vs typical soft point or round-nose profiles
• Boat-tail base — reduces base drag for further BC improvement
• 70%+ weight retention — published specification; the bonded construction is what guarantees this on heavy bone impacts

The Scirocco II sits in the same category as Nosler AccuBond and Federal Terminal Ascent — premium bonded polymer-tipped bullets designed for both accuracy and reliable terminal performance on medium to large game.

Fiocchi’s Three Hunting Lines — Where Extrema Fits

Fiocchi offers multiple 6.5 Creedmoor hunting lines at distinct price and performance tiers:

The Extrema line with Scirocco II is Fiocchi’s bonded bullet option — the appropriate choice when a non-bonded SST or InterLock is not enough for the hunting application.

Best Uses

Good fit:

• Whitetail and mule deer at ranges up to 400 yards where the bonded construction provides reliable expansion and penetration even on angled shots
• Elk and larger deer inside 300 yards — the Scirocco II’s bonding handles heavy shoulder bone reliably where non-bonded bullets can fail
• Hog hunting where dense bone and cartilage make bullet integrity critical
• Hunters who want a premium bonded bullet at a lower price than Nosler Trophy Grade AccuBond (~$60–70/box)
• Reloaders who want factory-loaded Scirocco II as a performance baseline

Not the right tool for:

• Lead-free requirements — Scirocco II has a lead core; see Fiocchi Hyperformance TTSX or Hornady Outfitter CX for non-toxic options
• Precision match shooting — Scirocco II is a hunting bullet, not a match bullet
• Budget hunting use — at $2.67/round there are capable non-bonded alternatives at half the price
• Self-defense — not designed or rated for it

Reliability Notes

No structured submissions yet. General notes from open sources:

• The Swift Scirocco II has an established field record on North American and African big game — Swift’s reputation among experienced hunters is strong, though the brand is less widely known than Hornady or Federal in the mass market
• Fiocchi Extrema brass is newly-made and reloadable — consistent with Fiocchi’s Italian brass production quality standards
• The bonded construction distinguishes this load from Fiocchi’s own SST offering at a moderate price premium — a meaningful upgrade for hunters pursuing elk or taking shots at difficult angles
• 70%+ weight retention is the published specification; real-world recoveries from hunters consistently report Scirocco II bullets retaining well above this minimum

Competitors

The Scirocco II’s BC of 0.571 outperforms the Federal Terminal Ascent (0.532) and AccuBond (0.531) at this weight — a meaningful advantage at extended ranges — while running $8–16/box less than those alternatives.

Price Reality

• Typical retail range: $52–56 per box of 20 (~$2.60–2.80/round)
• vs. Federal Terminal Ascent (bonded, 130 gr): Fiocchi runs $8–12/box less — the Scirocco II’s higher BC (0.571 vs 0.532) and lower price make this a compelling alternative
• vs. Nosler AccuBond (bonded, 140 gr): Fiocchi runs $8–14/box less for comparable bonded performance with a flatter trajectory from the higher velocity
• vs. Fiocchi Hyperformance SST (non-bonded): ~$16–18/box more for the bonded upgrade — worth it for elk and tough game, unnecessary for typical whitetail deer at moderate ranges
• Fair price benchmark: under $55/box is competitive for a premium bonded load; above $60/box approaches the Federal and Nosler alternatives

Where to Buy

Affiliate links. These do not influence ratings, data, or any editorial content on this page.

• MidwayUSA — add link
• Brownells — add link
• Palmetto State Armory — add link
• Natchez Shooters Supplies — add link

FAQ

What makes a bonded bullet different from a standard jacketed bullet?

In a standard jacketed bullet (SST, InterLock, Power-Point), the lead core and copper jacket are held together by mechanical fit — the jacket is swaged around the core. Under high-velocity impact on bone, the jacket can separate from the core, reducing penetration and energy transfer. A bonded bullet chemically or thermally fuses the core to the jacket during manufacturing — the Swift Scirocco II uses a chemical bonding process. This means the bullet retains its mass (70%+) through the target regardless of what it hits, producing consistent deep penetration even on angled shots through heavy bone.

Swift Scirocco II vs Nosler AccuBond — which is better for elk?

Both are premium bonded polymer-tipped bullets with similar performance profiles — deep penetration, high weight retention, reliable expansion. The key differences at 6.5 CM factory load specifications: Scirocco II in this Fiocchi load runs faster (2,820 fps vs AccuBond’s 2,700 fps), has a higher BC (0.571 vs 0.531), and costs less ($52–56 vs $60–70/box). For elk hunting, both are appropriate choices. The Swift Scirocco II’s advantage in this comparison is better ballistics at lower cost. The AccuBond has a longer and more widely documented track record in the US hunting community.

Why is Swift Bullets less well-known than Hornady or Nosler?

Swift Bullets is a smaller, Kansas-based company focused exclusively on precision hunting bullets — no military contracts, no range ammunition, no match line. Their product line is limited but their reputation among serious big game hunters is strong. The Scirocco was originally the first commercially successful bonded polymer-tipped hunting bullet, predating Nosler AccuBond by several years. The lower brand recognition in the mass market reflects their niche focus rather than any quality deficit.

Is this load appropriate for moose or bear?

For moose and black bear inside 250 yards the Scirocco II at 2,820 fps delivers adequate energy and the bonded construction handles penetration reliably. For brown bear or grizzly where maximum penetration on dangerous game is critical, a heavier caliber with a premium solid or partition bullet is the conventional recommendation. The 6.5 Creedmoor as a caliber is generally considered marginal for brown bear regardless of bullet choice — not a limitation of this specific load.

Submit Your Data · Real-World Results

Manufacturer velocity figures are measured under controlled lab conditions — barrel length, temperature, and lot number all affect real-world performance. The data below comes from community submissions tied to specific test conditions and reviewed before
publishing.

Once this page reaches 3 approved submissions, aggregate velocity
and confidence level will appear here automatically.

Shot this load? Share your results — firearm type, barrel length, average velocity, shots fired, temperature. No account required.

All submissions are manually reviewed before appearing on this page.

Results vary by firearm, barrel condition, ammunition lot, and environmental factors.
Submitted data is for reference only.
AmmoReports does not guarantee accuracy of user-submitted results.

Last updated: April 2026 · Data confidence: Low (0 submissions) ·